See contract analysis in action

Real analysis

Watch a real NDA get analysed

This is an actual GlobalLegalCheck report — 13 clauses read, scored, and gap-checked. See what it catches before you upload your own.

Hartnet salassapitosopimus.docx

Unilateral Non-Disclosure Agreement · Hartnet Oy → Reslink Solutions Oy · 26 June 2026

What the contract says

Risk score

13 clauses checked · 8 critical issues before you sign.

Severity breakdown

Agreement Titlehigh
What we found
Titled only “Salassapitosopimus” — it never signals the agreement is unilateral, which can create ambiguity about its nature.
Suggested fix
Rename it explicitly — “Unilateral Non-Disclosure Agreement” — so the one-sided structure is unmistakable.
Return or Destruction of Informationhigh
What we found
Requires return of materials but does not offer destruction as an alternative, demands no written confirmation, and is silent on electronic copies and backups.
Suggested fix
Add destruction as an option, require written confirmation, and explicitly cover electronic copies and backups.
Duration / Term and Terminationhigh
What we found
Sets a five-year confidentiality term but no clear start/end date for disclosure and no termination procedure.
Suggested fix
State an explicit effective date, term, and a notice / termination mechanism.
Liability, Indemnity & Governing Lawmedium
What we found
Caps liability at €100,000 but does not address indirect or reputational damages, nor whether they fall inside or outside the cap.
Suggested fix
Clarify the treatment of indirect and consequential damages relative to the liability cap.

Most tools only critique what’s written. GlobalLegalCheck also flags what isn’t there:

No Reverse EngineeringNo prohibition on reverse-engineering or decompiling — a serious gap when the deal covers security assessments and technical solutions.
Non-SolicitationNothing prevents poaching the disclosing party’s employees, customers, or partners, despite the sensitive business relationships involved.
Consideration / PaymentArbitration is described, but the contract never allocates arbitration costs, fees, or administrative charges.